<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

    <title>Fenwick &#38; West - Publications - Life Sciences</title>
    <link href="http://www.fenwickwest.com/rss/Default.asp"/>
    <updated>2010-07-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
    <id>http://www.fenwickwest.com/rss/Default.asp</id>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Strategy for Personalized Medicine in Light of Bilski</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/07-19-10_Patent_Strategy_for_Personalized_Medicine_Bilski.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/07-19-10_Patent_Strategy_for_Personalized_Medicine_Bilski.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-07-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-07-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Advanced medical diagnostics, such as those that use information derived from multiple genetic variations or biomarker expression levels, certainly fall within the scope of patentable subject matter, according to the guidance provided by the Bilski decision. Significant investment is required to develop and market complex personalized medicine diagnostics that prognose risk or outcome based on a number of genetic or biological markers. Such methods do not preempt any basic law of nature because alternative predictive models can be developed using different sets of markers. Consequently, they should not be subject to &#167; 101 rejections under current law.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Alert: Supreme Court Unanimously Rejects Bilski Patent Application but Narrowly Upholds Business Method Patents</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Alert_06-28-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Alert_06-28-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-06-28T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-06-28T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Bilski case presented the Supreme Court with an opportunity to eliminate business methods from the scope of patentable subject matter</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Tax Alert: Qualifying Therapeutic Discovery Project Credits and Grants</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Tax/Tax_Alert_04-07-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Tax/Tax_Alert_04-07-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-04-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-04-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The enactment on March 23, 2010 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 established a 50% nonrefundable tax credit for qualified investments in qualifying therapeutic discovery projects of eligible taxpayers.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Bracing for Change in Patentability for Methods: Strategies for Companies and Venture Capitalists to Manage the Bilski Risk</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Managing_the_Bilski_Risk.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Managing_the_Bilski_Risk.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-01-13T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-01-13T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Four Fenwick attorneys recently attended an oral argument at the U.S. Supreme Court at which justices surprised the patent community by signaling that they likely will cut back on the types of methods that are eligible for patent protection.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Pools in Life Sciences</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Pools.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Pools.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-12-03T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-12-03T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A patent pool is defined as an arrangement among multiple patent holders to aggregate their patents where all pooled patents are made available to each member of the pool, and standard licensing terms are offered to licensees who are not members of the pool.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Ariad Written Description Ruling Could Significantly Impact Biotech Patents</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/2009-09-02_Ariad_Written_Description.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/2009-09-02_Ariad_Written_Description.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-09-02T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-09-02T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The fate of many chemical and biotechnology patents will soon depend on the Federal Circuit's interpretation of the first paragraph of section 112 of the Patent Act.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>An Unclear Diagnosis</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/LifeSciences/An_Unclear_Diagnosis.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/LifeSciences/An_Unclear_Diagnosis.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-07-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>What constitutes patentable subject matter? The tension between the broad language of 35 U.S.C. Section 101 and the limitations of its scope by the courts is playing out in the context of patent eligibility of process claimsy...</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2008 Silicon Valley Life Science VC Survey</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/vcsurvey/2008_Lifesciences_VC_Survey_F.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/vcsurvey/2008_Lifesciences_VC_Survey_F.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-03-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-03-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The results of our fifth annual San Francisco Bay Area Life Science Venture Capital Valuation Survey...</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Making Sense of the Revived &quot;Machine-or-Transformation&quot; Test in In re  Bilski</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2009-03-16_In_re_Bilski.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2009-03-16_In_re_Bilski.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-03-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-03-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On October 30, 2008, in In re Bilski, No. 07-1130 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 30, 2008) the Federal Circuit handed down the latest judicial effort to provide guidance about the types of subject matter that are eligible for patent protection...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>On Shaky Ground: The (Near) Future of Patents After Bilski</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2009-03-16_In_re_Bilski.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2009-03-16_In_re_Bilski.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-03-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-03-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On October 30, 2008, in In re Bilski, No. 07-1130 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 30, 2008) the Federal Circuit handed down the latest judicial effort to provide guidance about the types of subject matter that are eligible for patent protection...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2007 Silicon Valley Life Science VC Survey</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/vcsurvey/2007_Lifesciences_VC_Survey.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/vcsurvey/2007_Lifesciences_VC_Survey.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-03-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-03-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The results of our fourth annual San Francisco Bay Area Life Science Venture Capital Valuation Survey show a continuation of the positive trend in the life science venture environment.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Perspective: Patents, post-MedImmune</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/LifeSciences/Perspective_Patents_MedImmune.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/LifeSciences/Perspective_Patents_MedImmune.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-08-31T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-08-31T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Earlier this year, the Supreme Court shook the foundations of patent licensing and technology transfer, altering the balance of power between patent holders and their licensees and creating profound implications for the life-sciences industry.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Integra LifeSciences I, Ltd. v. Merck KGaA&#8212;Applying the Supreme Court's Broad Interpretation of the FDA Exemption for Patent Infringement</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-30-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-30-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-07-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-07-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On July 27, the Federal Circuit in Integra LifeSciences v. Merck ruled on the Supreme Court's broad interpretation of the patent infringement exemption set forth in 35 U.S.C. &#167; 271(e)(1), for &quot;uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information&quot; to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert - Supreme Court Knocks Down Federal Circuit Rule and Allows Licensees to Challenge a Licensed Patent</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_01-10-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_01-10-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-01-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-01-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Yesterday, the Supreme Court ruled in MedImmune v. Genentech that a patent licensee does not need to breach its license agreement before seeking a declaratory judgment in federal court that the underlying patent is invalid, unenforceable, or not infringed.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2005 Trends in Life Sciences Partnering and Collaborations</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/LifeSciences/2005_Trends_Partnering.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/LifeSciences/2005_Trends_Partnering.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-03-28T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-03-28T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Ten years ago, when a biotech company needed to raise capital, the avenue most frequently sought was the capital markets. Today, rising drug development costs can approach $1 billion, making a biotech's need for capital more intense than ever.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Life Sciences Companies Face Special Disclosure Challenges</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/LifeSciences/Disclosure_Issues.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/LifeSciences/Disclosure_Issues.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-03-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-03-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Life sciences companies face difficult disclosure issues because they operate in a particularly complex and financially sensitive regulatory environment.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>University Licensing: An Introduction to Licensing Technology from Universities</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/university_licensing.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/university_licensing.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-01-03T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-01-03T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary> What do Yamaha synthesizers, gene splicing and DSL have in common? They are all based on technology licensed from universities. As these examples show, universities often develop and license new cutting edge technologies.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Follow-on Biological Products&#8212;Legal Issues</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/follow-on.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/follow-on.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-11-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-11-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Many biologics, including blockbusters like Epogen/Procrit, are nearing patent expiration, and generics manufacturers, including Sicor (acquired by Teva), Barr Laboratories, and Ivax Corporation, are hoping to market generic biologics.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Authorized Generics: Antitrust Issues and the Hatch-Waxman Act</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Authorized_Generics.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Authorized_Generics.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-11-03T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-11-03T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>An  authorized generic (AG) is a  pharmaceutical product  that was originally  marketed and sold by a  brand company, but  is relabeled and marketed under a  generic product  name.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Law Update - Sweeping New Rules Apply to Securities Offerings by Technology and Life Science Companies</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_09-30-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_09-30-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-09-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-09-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A major modernization of federal regulations that apply to registered securities offerings takes effect December 1, 2005.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Strategy and Best Practices in China and India Life Sciences Business Transactions</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/IP_Strategy_&amp;_Practices.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/IP_Strategy_&amp;_Practices.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-11-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-11-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This paper is based on a presentation made at the Asia America Multitechnology Association (&quot;AAMA&quot;) Conference on October 8, 2004.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Will China Become a Global Power in Biotech?</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/China_Global_Power.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/China_Global_Power.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2003-12-05T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2003-12-05T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>There are a number of dimensions in becoming a global power.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Licensing for High Technology and Life Sciences Companies</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Licensing.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Licensing.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2003-01-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2003-01-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Virtually all high technology companies rely on licenses to achieve their business goals.
</summary>
    </entry>

</feed>
