<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

    <title>Fenwick &#38; West - Publications - Trademark</title>
    <link href="http://www.fenwickwest.com/rss/Default.asp"/>
    <updated>2010-08-05T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
    <id>http://www.fenwickwest.com/rss/Default.asp</id>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Summer 2010</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2010.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2010.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-08-05T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-08-05T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A unanimous decision is not always what it seems. On June 28, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld without dissent the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit&#8217;s ruling that a patent application for hedging against price changes was not patentable.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Spring 2010</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2010.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2010.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-04-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-04-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In the opening weeks of 2010, Parliament in London took up a bill to consider whether company directors might be held personally liable in certain areas implicating health and safety of workers.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Facing Off On Facebook&#174;? Trademarks and the Social Net</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2010-03-17_Facing_Off_Facebook.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2010-03-17_Facing_Off_Facebook.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-03-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-03-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The increasing prevalence and popularity of social networking and similar sites raise new issues for brand
owners and celebrities.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Is There A Second Life For Trademarks In Second Life&#174;?</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2010-03-17_Is_There_A_Second_Life.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2010-03-17_Is_There_A_Second_Life.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-03-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-03-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Recent years have seen the development of online communities through which massive numbers of users can interact with each other and with the environment itself in ways that increasingly approach real-world interactions.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Winter 2009/2010</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Winter_09-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Winter_09-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-12-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-12-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Recent years have seen the development of online communities through which massive numbers of users can interact with each other and with the environment itself in ways that increasingly approach real-world interactions.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>IP Bulletin Fall 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2009.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2009.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-10-06T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-10-06T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A recent ruling in a highly publicized case in the United States District Court for the Central District of California rejected an aggressive legal theory that could have led to broad criminalization of the breach of terms conditioning access to websites and other computerized information.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>IP Bulletin Summer 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2009.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2009.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-07-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) began in July 2006 as a pilot, one-year cooperative agreement between the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Japan Patent Office (JPO). </summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: FLIR Systems, Inc. v. Parrish</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_06-22-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_06-22-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-06-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The California Court of Appeal's recent opinion in FLIR Sys., Inc. v. Parrish, ___ Cal. App. 4th ___, 2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 943 (2d Dist. June 15, 2009) reinforces the need for careful deliberation in determining when and where to seek injunctive relief against trade secret misappropriation by former employees</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>The Transfer of Intellectual Property Rights: Can There Be Too Much Freedom in the Marketplace for Ideas?</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Transfer_IP_Rights.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Transfer_IP_Rights.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-05-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-05-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We Americans take for granted the fact that intellectual property rights can be transferred from one person to another. A small &quot;garage&quot; inventor can sell patent rights to a manufacturing company. Two sparring competitors can settle their disputes by a cross-license of rights. Franchises can be built by licensing out trade secrets to local operators....</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Top Ten Patent Issues for the New Director of the Patent and Trademark Office</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Top_Ten_Patent_Issues.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Top_Ten_Patent_Issues.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-05-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-05-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Imminently, the Obama Administration will be naming a new Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (&amp;quot;PTO&amp;quot;). The PTO, which used to be a quiet backwater of a niche area of law, has recently found itself front and center in some high profile debates. From congressional efforts aimed at fixing a &amp;quot;broken&amp;quot; patent system to Supreme Court cases considering whether Internet Age innovations deserve the same patent protection as Industrial Age innovations, the work of the PTO is increasingly important to our society.....</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Spring 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2009.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2009.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-03-20T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-03-20T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A bipartisan quartet of senators and representatives held a press conference on March 3, 2009 announcing yet another push at patent law reform. Hearings commenced the following week...</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Winter 2008/2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Winter_2008_2009.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Winter_2008_2009.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-12-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-12-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Personalized medicine companies should implement new strategies to deal with the challenges associated with protecting their inventions...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>The Still Blurry Standards for Proving Trademark Dilution</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Blurry_Trademark_Dilution.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Blurry_Trademark_Dilution.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-10-20T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-20T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In 2006, Congress passed the Trademark Dilution Revision Act, or &amp;quot;TDRA.&amp;quot;  Hailed by some and criticized by others, the TDRA was widely expected to make it easier for the owners of famous trademarks to prevail in claims for trademark dilution...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Fall 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2008.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2008.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-10-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In Fisher Tool Co., v. Gillet Outillage, 530 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2008), the Ninth Circuit adopted the Federal Circuit's standard requiring a showing of bad faith in order to maintain Lanham Act and state law claims premised on allegedly false representations of patent infringement made by a patentee, its distributors, agents and/or attorneys to third parties...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Summer 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2008.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2008.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-07-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Rejecting the authority of a trio of more recent Ninth Circuit cases on the ground that their holdings could not be reconciled with an earlier Ninth Circuit decision, a Washington District Court has held a transfer of computer software to represent a sale, not a license...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Spring 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2008.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2008.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-05-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-05-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Just as a semiconductor clean room aims to exclude airborne particles that could contaminate wafer layers, so the legal software clean room has sought to protect computer software developers from contaminating &amp;quot;access&amp;quot; to earlier works they might be charged with copying...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Winter 2008</title>
        <link href="After unanimous approval by the California Assembly and the California Senate, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed S.B. 771 into law on October 10, 2007, amending California Civil Code section 3344.1."/>
        <id>After unanimous approval by the California Assembly and the California Senate, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed S.B. 771 into law on October 10, 2007, amending California Civil Code section 3344.1.</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-03-03T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-03-03T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary></summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Fall 2007</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2007.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2007.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-10-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-10-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Disclosures to government regulators have always posed risks to trade secrets and other proprietary information.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Spring 2007</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2007.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2007.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-04-02T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-04-02T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Supreme Court has ruled that patent licensees do not need to breach their license agreements before seeking a declaratory judgment in federal court that the underlying patent is invalid, unenforceable, or not infringed.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Ninth Circuit Extends Sublicensing Rule to Trademark Licenses</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-25-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-25-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-07-25T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-07-25T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On July 19, 2006, the Ninth Circuit held in Miller v. Glenn Miller Productions, Inc., No. 04-55874 (9th Cir. 2006) that a licensee of trademark and related publicity rights does not have the right to sublicense those rights to third parties without the licensor's express permission.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Summer 2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2006.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2006.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-06-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-06-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A patent gives its owner the right to exclude others from making, using and selling the claimed invention. Thus, patent rights give a patentee great control over who uses his or her invention.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fair Use Palooza&#8212;The Supreme Court's KP Permanent Decision Opens a Can of Worms</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/fair_use_palooza.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/fair_use_palooza.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-04-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-04-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Statutory, or classic &quot;fair use&quot;&amp;#8212;the use, other than as trademarks, of common words, in their ordinary descriptive sense&amp;#8212;has long been a seemingly straightforward, not particularly controversial aspect of trademark law.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>The Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2005 Takes Actual Dilution To Task</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Trademark_Dilution.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Trademark_Dilution.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-03-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-03-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Three years ago, in Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003) (&quot;Victoria's Secret&quot;), the Supreme Court held that the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Winter 2005/2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Winter_0506.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Winter_0506.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-03-21T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-03-21T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In today's global marketplace, patent protection continues to be an important part of a company's overall business and intellectual property strategy. However, protection provided by any one patent is limited to within the country in which it was granted.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Copyright Basics - Just Enough Copyright Law If You Are Not an Attorney or IP Expert</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Copyright_Basics.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Copyright_Basics.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-02-21T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-02-21T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Copyright refers to the rights of authors in works of authorship &amp;#8212; as distinguished from patents (whose subject matter is inventions), trademarks (which concern symbols of an enterprise's reputation and goodwill) and trade secrets (information whose value derives from being kept secret).
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trademark Selection and Protection for High Technology Companies</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/TM_Selection_for_HighTech.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/TM_Selection_for_HighTech.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-02-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-02-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Among a company's most valuable assets are the symbols by which that company and its products or services are known to the public.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Fall 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2005.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2005.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-11-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-11-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On November 7, 2005, the Recording Industry Association of America issued a press release announcing settlement of the longstanding file-sharing dispute with Grokster.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Strategic Intellectual Property Planning</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Strategic_IP_Planning.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Strategic_IP_Planning.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-08-25T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-08-25T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The recognition of intellectual property as an intellectual asset, and an asset generally, is paramount to successful strategic intellectual property planning. Intellectual property should be thought of as having the characteristics of an asset, and should be so managed.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Spring 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2005.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2005.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-06-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-06-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>CoStar Reopens Settled Fixation Issue/Trademark Infringement and the Fair Use Defense/Changes in Store for &quot;Ailing&quot; Patent System/Family Entertainment and Copyright Act Becomes Law.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trademark Infringement and the Fair Use Defense</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Trademark_Infringmnt_and_Fair_Use.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Trademark_Infringmnt_and_Fair_Use.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-06-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-06-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In a December 8, 2004, decision, the Supreme Court resolved a split in the appellate courts on the significance of likelihood of confusion in a fair use defense to a trademark infringement claim.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Typosquatting and the Duty to Police Infringing Trademarks</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/IP_Strategist_0605.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/IP_Strategist_0605.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Initial Interest Confusion and 'Post-Initial Confusion'.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Correct Inventorship Prevents Patent Application Headaches</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Correct_Inventorship.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Correct_Inventorship.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-05-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-05-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Although companies race to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to build their patent portfolios, technically, a company is not granted a patent.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Winter 2004&#8212;2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Winter_04-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Winter_04-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-12-28T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-12-28T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Trademarks on a Shoestring for Start-Ups/Circuit Courts Narrow the Reach of the DMCA's Anti-Circumvention Provisions/Quick Updates
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Raising Initial Funding for High Technology Companies in the San Francisco Bay Area</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Raising_Initial_Funding.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Raising_Initial_Funding.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-09-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-09-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This is a brief summary of the process for raising initial funding in the Bay Area for high technology companies.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Fall 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2004.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2004.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-09-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-09-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Federal Circuit Whacks the Doctrine of Equivalents Again/The Role of Dictionaries in Patent Claim Construction/ Quick Updates.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>UDRP Versus ACPA: Choosing the Right Tool to Challenge Cybersquatting</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/UDRP_Versus_ACPA.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/UDRP_Versus_ACPA.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2003-09-29T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2003-09-29T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>One of the most frequent sources of conflict on the Internet has resulted from the unauthorized registration and use of domain names containing other parties' trademarks or company names, a practice commonly referred to as cybersquatting.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Domain Name Dispute Remedies: Tools for Taming the World Wide Web</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Domain_Name_Dispute.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Domain_Name_Dispute.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2003-06-04T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2003-06-04T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Providing a new forum for brand promotion, the Internet has significantly impacted both the use and abuse of trademarks.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Spring 2003</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2003.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2003.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2003-05-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2003-05-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Put It in Writing/Federal Trademark Dilution Law: The New Landscape/Quick Updates
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>eVolution or Revolution? Trademark Law on the Internet</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Trademark_Law_On_The_Internet.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Trademark_Law_On_The_Internet.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2002-05-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2002-05-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>I. Trademark Infringement / II. Likelihood of Confusion on the Internet / III. Trademark Dilution / IV. Cyberpiracy Relief
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Fall 2001</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2001.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2001.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2001-12-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2001-12-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Are Borderline Generic Domain Names Such As e-cards.com and cards.com Protectable Trademarks?/ European Block Exemptions and What They Mean for California Lawyers/Quick Updates
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Spring 1999</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_1999.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_1999.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>1999-05-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>1999-05-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Private Information For Sale: The Coming of Online Privacy Regulations/Avoiding International Trademark Disputes On The Internet/Quick Updates
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trademark Issues in Cyberspace: The Brave New Frontier</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Trademark_in_Cyberspace.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Trademark_in_Cyberspace.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>1998-07-21T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>1998-07-21T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Cyberspace raises a variety of thought&amp;ndash;provoking trademark and trademark-related issues.
</summary>
    </entry>

</feed>
