spacer image  spacer image  spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
Publications
 spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
 spacer image
Fenwick & West LLP  spacer image
 search image SEARCH
 
Fenwick & West Home HOME
Contact Us CONTACT US
 pixel spacer image
Subscribe to Fenwick & West Publications

 

1/10/2012 Fenwick Employment Brief - January 2012
In a major wage/hour ruling, the California Supreme Court clarified the test used to analyze whether the administrative exemption to overtime applies to employees. more
spacer
12/14/2011 Fenwick Employment Brief - December 2011
In Kennedy v. Glen Mills School, a federal court in Pennsylvania dismissed a terminated employee's claim of disability discrimination (based on alleged alcoholism) because the employee... more
spacer
11/10/2011 Fenwick Employment Brief - November 10, 2011
Governor Brown approved several additional laws that take effect January 1, 2012 and add to employer obligations. more
spacer
10/11/2011 Fenwick Employment Brief - October 11, 2011
The Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") recently announced a program to encourage employers to reclassify workers who were previously misclassified as independent contractors. more
spacer
9/19/2011 Fenwick Emploment Brief - September 19, 2011
In a troubling case for employers, a California court of appeal held in Pantoja v. Anton that it was prejudicial error for a trial court to exclude so-called "me too" evidence of sexual harassment of other employees. more
spacer
8/16/2011 Fenwick Emploment Brief - August 16, 2011
The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) ruled last month that an employer’s termination of non-unionized employees who had appeared on a television newscast wearing their uniforms while making disparaging statements about the employer violated the National Labor Relations Act more
spacer
7/20/2011 Death of a Paper Salesman? An Analysis of Going Paperless
With the "going green" movement and the rising costs of operating a business, many companies are opting – or at least attempting – to go "paperless." more
spacer
7/13/2011 Fenwick Employment Brief - July 13, 2011
A series of recent cases demonstrate a growing tendency among federal courts in the Northern District of California towards greater scrutiny and limitation of wage and hour class actions more
spacer
7/7/2011 Fenwick & West Employment Brief Special Bulletin - July 2011
In a disappointing result for employers with potentially far-reaching consequences, the California Supreme Court ruled in Sullivan v. Oracle Corporation that California employers must apply state overtime rules to out-of-state employees who perform work within California. more
spacer
6/30/2011 "Unlimited Vacation" Policies Gaining Traction
In California and elsewhere, several companies have moved away from traditional vacation accrual policies to an unlimited vacation ... more
spacer
6/23/2011 Fenwick & West Employment Brief Special Bulletin - June 2011
In a far-reaching and favorable decision for employers, the U.S. Supreme Court in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes barred the "most expansive class action ever" as lacking evidence of the "common policy of discrimination" necessary for class treatment. more
spacer
6/14/2011 Fenwick Employment Brief - June 2011
In California, certain commissioned salespersons may be properly classified as exempt from overtime. more
spacer
5/13/2011 Fenwick Employment Brief - May 2011
In Wills v. Superior Court of Orange County, a California appellate court considered the case of Linda Wills, a long-time employee of the Orange County Superior Court who suffers from bipolar disorder that subjects her to depressive and manic episodes. more
spacer
4/11/2011 Labor and Employment Roundtable: Current Issues in California and Federal Employment Law
Technological innovations have introduced a host of new legal questions to the employment law area. Thanks to computer and mobile technology, workforces are increasingly virtual and global, creating new tensions in labor law compliance, particularly when it comes to wage-and-hour requirements. more
spacer
4/8/2011 Fenwick Employment Brief - April 2011
The Supreme Court ruled last month that workers who complain about wage violations to their employer are protected from retaliation under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) more
spacer
3/14/2011 Fenwick Employment Brief - March 2011
In a troubling decision for employers, the United States Supreme Court has endorsed the so-called "cat's paw" doctrine of employment discrimination. more
spacer
1/7/2011 Fenwick Employment Brief - January 2011
In a recent California Court of Appeals ruling, an employer was allowed to proceed with a defamation lawsuit seeking damages and injunctive relief against former employees and a community activist who publicly claimed that the employer was racist when... more
spacer
1/3/2011 Summary of Covenants Not To Compete: A Global Perspective
Fenwick & West participated in a substantial collaborative effort by the members of The Techlaw Group on the subject of Covenants Not to Compete. The publication is a compilation of the laws regarding noncompetition agreements covering the United States and several European countries. more
spacer
12/15/2010 Fenwick Employment Brief - December 2010
According to a recent California appellate opinion, a compensation plan provision promising a future reduced sales quota upon achievement of certain age and tenure requirements may result in a binding contract the employer could not alter after the requirements had been met. more
spacer
11/10/2010 Fenwick Employment Brief - November 2010
In EEOC v. Prospect Airport Services, Inc., plaintiff Rudolpho Lamas was allowed to proceed with his case for sexual harassment by a co-worker after the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a summary judgment in the employer's favor. more
spacer
9/15/2010 Fenwick Employment Brief - September 15, 2010
Two recent federal appellate decisions highlight some of the procedural pitfalls that lurk within the federal Family and Medical Leave Act ("FMLA"). more
spacer
8/11/2010 Fenwick Employment Brief - August 11, 2010
It is often difficult to get a court to dismiss an employment discrimination case prior to trial due to the number of critical facts involved that generally require resolution by a jury, including the employer'stivating reasons for the adverse employment action. more
spacer
7/14/2010 Fenwick Employment Brief - July 14, 2010
In an unpublished decision, a California appellate court revived a plaintiff's claim for age discrimination, finding admissible his proffered "me too" evidence of a corporate plan to drive out older managers more
spacer
6/18/2010 Employment Practice Group Alert: Supreme Court Rules That Employer Search Of Employee Text Messages Did Not Violate Fourth Amendment
In City of Ontario v. Quon, the United States Supreme Court held that a government employer's review of an employee's text messages sent and received on an employer-issued pager did not violate the employee's Fourth Amendment constitutional rights. more
spacer
6/9/2010 Fenwick Employment Brief - June 9, 2010
In a favorable decision for business, the California Supreme Court held that the commercial wholesalers who purchased strawberries from a farmer could not be held liable... more
spacer
5/12/2010 Fenwick Employment Brief - May 12, 2010
The Ninth Circuit recently affirmed a 2004 district court's decision to certify a nationwide class of women in a gender discrimination class action against Wal-Mart, the country’s largest retailer. more
spacer
4/13/2010 Fenwick Employment Brief - April 13, 2010
The California Department of Labor Standards Enforcement's strict (and somewhat inconsistent) requirements regarding unpaid interns made it difficult for California businesses to employ them more
spacer
3/12/2010 Fenwick Employment Brief - March 12, 2010
In Tides v. Boeing, a federal district court in Seattle ruled that two employees who leaked documents to the media were not protected whistleblowers under the Sarbanes OxleyAct ("SOX"). more
spacer
2/10/2010 Fenwick Employment Brief - February 10, 2010
A California appellate court rejected an employer's affirmative defense that account executives were exempt administrative employees because their work did not relate to the management policies or general business operations of the employer or its customers more
spacer
1/12/2010 Fenwick Employment Brief - January 12, 2010
To properly classify an employee as exempt, an employer must satisfy the salary-basis test by paying a salary, "without deduction," regardless of how many or how few hours the employee works during the pay period. Courts and agencies, however, have allowed employers to deduct from an employee's vacation or sick leave balance in full-day increments without violating the test. more
spacer
1/4/2010 Employee Benefits Alert: Congress Extends COBRA Premium Assistance Subsidy
On December 19, 2009, President Obama signed the 2010 Department of Defense Appropriations Act (the "DOD Act"), which extended two significant features of the COBRA health care continuation coverage premium subsidy originally enacted in early 2009 by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act ("ARRA"). more
spacer
12/11/2009 Fenwick Employment Brief - December 11, 2009
Although California has a long-standing prohibition on noncompetition agreements, as codified in Business and Professions Code Section 16600, courts have historically allowed such agreements where necessary to protect an employer’s trade secrets more
spacer
11/17/2009 Fenwick Employment Brief - November 17, 2009
The California Supreme Court recently upheld the forfeiture of a departing employee's restricted stock and the money used to purchase it, rejecting the employee's claim it amounted to an unlawful forfeiture of wages. more
spacer
10/15/2009 Fenwick Employment Brief - October 15, 2009
Flu season is upon us, and this year the concerns are heightened due to the threat posed by the H1N1 influenza virus (also referred to as the swine flu). Presently, thirty seven states, including California and Washington, have reported widespread swine flu activity, and the Centers For Disease Control (CDC) is recommending that individuals take precautions to reduce the likelihood of virus transmission. In light of the possible impact of the swine flu (or other communicable disease) on businesses, employers should be prepared to address both the practical and legal concerns arising from an outbreak. more
spacer
9/9/2009 Fenwick Employment Brief - September 9, 2009
In Van Asdale v. International Game Technology, the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit issued its first decision defining the scope of protected conduct under the whistleblower protection provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("SOX"). more
spacer
8/27/2009 Employee Benefits Alert: Another 401(k) Headache: Covering Leased Employees
In a recent employee benefits alert, we looked at temporary and part-time employees, and the circumstances under which an employer must cover them under its 401(k) plan.... more
spacer
8/14/2009 Fenwick Employment Brief - August 14, 2009
Balancing employee privacy rights and an employer's right to monitor its workplace is a challenge. In Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc., the California Supreme Court clarified the law in this area and articulated important principles regarding workplace privacy more
spacer
7/16/2009 Fenwick Employment Brief - July 16, 2009
The California and U.S. Supreme Courts handed down three very important decisions in recent weeks that affect several key aspects of employment law... more
spacer
7/2/2009 Employee Benefits Alert: A Trap for the Unwary Employer: Failure to Cover Part-Time and Temporary Employees Under a 401(k) Plan
Clients often ask us whether certain groups of employees, such as part-time or temporary employees, must be covered under their 401(k) plan more
spacer
6/10/2009 Fenwick Employment Brief - June 10, 2009
In Applied Materials v. Advanced Micro-Fabrication Equipment Company, the federal district court for the Northern District of California refused to enforce an invention assignment clause that required former employees to assign inventions disclosed within one year of termination of employment if the invention related to work performed by the employee for the employer.... more
spacer
5/14/2009 Employee Benefits Alert: Update on Health Care Reform: Has San Francisco Finally "Cracked the ERISA Code?"
The Department of Labor has just released several model notices (including election forms) to reflect the new COBRA subsidy requirements of ARRA, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.... more
spacer
5/14/2009 Fenwick Employment Brief - May 14, 2009
Although the swine flu outbreak appears to have peaked (for the time being), employers should nevertheless remain vigilant and take the following proactive steps to deal with a potential full blown pandemic... more
spacer
4/15/2009 Fenwick Employment Brief - April 15, 2009
In 14 Penn Plaza v. Pyett, the Supreme Court ruled (5-4) that provisions in collective bargaining agreements requiring union members to arbitrate claims arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act can bar private lawsuits by aggrieved employees.... more
spacer
3/24/2009 Employee Benefits Alert: New COBRA Subsidy Model Notices
The Department of Labor has just released several model notices (including election forms) to reflect the new COBRA subsidy requirements of ARRA, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.... more
spacer
3/19/2009 Litigation Alert: California Supreme Court Settles Law Regarding Enforceability of Non-Competition Agreements, Releases of Claims
The California Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District recently issued an important decision confirming the preemptive effect of California’s Uniform Trade Secrets Act ("CUTSA") on common law claims... more
spacer
3/12/2009 Fenwick Employment Brief - March 12, 2009
A group of Oracle employees who resided outside California but traveled into the state periodically to perform work for Oracle sued the company, claiming that they were entitled to the benefits of California's more favorable overtime laws.... more
spacer
2/23/2009 Employee Benefits Alert: COBRA Subsidy Provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
On February 17, President Barack Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ("ARRA") into law. This stimulus package provides significant health care continuation coverage relief for lower- and moderate-income employees who are involuntarily terminated between September 1, 2008 and December 31, 2009... more
spacer
2/9/2009 Fenwick Employment Brief - February 9, 2009
President Obama has signed into law the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 ("Fair Pay Act"), which provides that an unlawful employment practice occurs not only when an employer makes a discriminatory decision about the employee';s compensation, but each time an employee receives a paycheck or other compensation affected by the discrimination.... more
spacer
1/13/2009 Costco Decision Could Significantly Change Scope of Attorney-Client Privilege
The case of Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Superior Court, currently pending before the California Supreme Court, may dramatically affect the manner in which clients interact with and utilize their lawyers.... more
spacer
1/13/2009 Fenwick Employment Brief - January 13, 2009
Although Starbucks has been the target of numerous class action lawsuits in the U.S., the company defeated plaintiffs in one recent class action arising out of the criminal background question in its job application.... more
spacer
12/10/2008 Fenwick Employment Brief - December 10, 2008
more
spacer
11/20/2008 Fenwick Employment Brief - November 20, 2008
The California Supreme Court recently granted review of Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, in which a Court of Appeal held that an employer's obligation to "provide" rest and meal breaks to employees means only that the employer must make such breaks available to employees... more
spacer
10/7/2008 Fenwick Employment Brief - October 7, 2008
As of September 30, 2008, exempt computer professionals in California can be paid a minimum of $75,000 per year for full-time employment on a salaried basis, rather than the previous requirement of at least $36 per hour... more
spacer
9/18/2008 Fenwick Employment Brief - September 18, 2008
Avila v. Continental Airlines, Inc. is the latest court decision to highlight the often complex intersection between disability and medical leave laws... more
spacer
8/12/2008 Fenwick Employment Brief - August 12, 2008
California DLSE: Employers Must Make Meal and Rest Breaks Available, Need Not Ensure Employees Take Breaks—and Yet Another Court Agrees; California Supreme Court Confirms Non-competes are Unenforceable in California, Eases Requirements on Releases; NLRB Strikes Down Firing of Employee Who Breached an Illegal Confidentiality Provision; News Bites... more
spacer
8/8/2008 Litigation Alert: California Supreme Court Settles Law Regarding Enforceability of Non-Competition Agreements, Releases of Claims
The California Supreme Court has ruled in Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP, ___ Cal. 4th ___ , 2008 Cal. LEXIS 9618 (Cal. Aug. 7, 2008) (No. S147190), that non-competition agreements in California are invalid under California Business and Professions Code Section 16600 ("Section 16600")... more
spacer
7/23/2008 Fenwick Employment Alert: July 23, 2008
In a victory for California employers, a California appellate court ruled that an employer's duty to "provide" rest and meal breaks to employees means that the employer need only make such breaks available to employees, and not that it ensure that employees actually take such breaks. more
spacer
7/10/2008 Fenwick Employment Brief - July 10, 2008
In Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Company, police officer Quon sued a wireless company and his employer City of Ontario for violating his privacy by accessing his personal text messages sent by way of an employer-provided pager. more
spacer
6/10/2008 Fenwick Employment Brief - June 10, 2008
In CBOCS West, Inc. v. Humphries, the United States Supreme Court decided (in a 7-2 vote) that 42 U.S.C. § 1981, which was enacted shortly after the Civil War as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 to prohibit race discrimination, also encompasses claims of retaliation in employment. more
spacer
5/15/2008 Fenwick Employment Brief - May 15, 2008
In a victory for employers, a California appellate court confirmed owners, officers, and managing agents' limited personal liability under California law for a corporation's failure to pay wages. more
spacer
4/11/2008 Fenwick Employment Brief - April 11, 2008
In a victory for employers, the California Supreme Court held in a 4-3 decision in Jones v. The Lodge at Torrey Pines Partnership that supervisors cannot be held personally liable for retaliation under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). more
spacer
3/11/2008 Fenwick Employment Brief - March 11, 2008
In Sprint/United Mgmt. Co. v. Mendelsohn, the United State Supreme Court held that "me too" evidence of discrimination is neither per se admissible nor per se inadmissible in an age discrimination lawsuit... more
spacer
2/8/2008 Fenwick Employment Brief - February 8, 2008
In a significant ruling for employers, the California Supreme Court recently held that an employer is not required to accommodate an employee who uses medical marijuana. more
spacer
1/8/2008 Fenwick Employment Brief - January 8, 2008
The NLRB ruled in The Guard Publishing Company, dba The Register Guard that employers may enforce a policy that prohibits employees from using employer email for "non-job-related solicitations" (including union organizing efforts), so long as they do so in a non-discriminatory manner. more
spacer
12/10/2007 Fenwick Employment Brief - December 10, 2007
In Mokler v. County of Orange, a California Court of Appeal held there was sufficient evidence to support a plaintiff's retaliatory dismissal claim, but rejected her sexual harassment claim as not being sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of her employment. more
spacer
11/20/2007 Fenwick Employment Brief - November 20, 2007
Effective January 1, 2008, the minimum hourly rate for exempt computer software professionals will be $36, down from this year’s minimum of $49.77. more
spacer
10/8/2007 Fenwick Employment Brief - October 8, 2007
In a decision narrowing the scope of the administrative exemption, a California Court of Appeal held in Harris v. Superior Court that insurance claims adjusters were improperly classified under the administrative exemption because they performed "production" rather than administrative work. more
spacer
9/10/2007 Fenwick Employment Brief - September 10, 2007
The California Supreme Court has provided guidance regarding the enforceability of a ban on class actions in employment arbitration agreements. more
spacer
7/10/2007 Fenwick Employment Brief - July 10, 2007
In an unusual decision specifically addressing a "no-hire clause," a California appellate court articulated some guidelines as to the enforceability of such provisions. more
spacer
6/18/2007 Fenwick Employment Brief - June 18, 2007
In a favorable decision for employers, the U.S. Supreme Court held that an employee's Title VII claim for sex discrimination — based on allegations of unequal pay compared to her male peers - was untimely because she waited several years following the allegedly discriminatory acts to bring her claim. more
spacer
5/9/2007 Fenwick Employment Brief - May 9, 2007
Employers with 100 or more employees and federal contractors with 50 or more employees must comply with new Employer Information Report (EEO-1) requirements, including a revised report form that must be used in 2007 and revised collection and reporting requirements for 2008. more
spacer
4/17/2007 Employment Law Alert: Payment for Missed Meal and Rest Periods Is a "Wage" Subject to Three-Year Statute of Limitations
In a unanimous decision, the California Supreme Court held that the hour of pay to which non-exempt employees are entitled when they are denied a meal or rest period constitutes a wage, not a penalty. more
spacer
4/11/2007 Fenwick Employment Brief - April 11, 2007
In Cintas Corp. v. NLRB, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that an employer committed an unfair labor practice under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) by simply publishing its policy on confidentiality, even though the rule did not expressly forbid protected discussions nor was there evidence that the rule was used to prohibit protected activity. more
spacer
3/12/2007 Fenwick Employment Brief - March 12, 2007
In Walton v. U.S. Marshall Service, the Ninth Circuit clarified the legal standard for establishing a "regarded as" disability discrimination claim. Naomi Walton, a court security guard, was terminated from her employment after failing to meet her employer's hearing standard. more
spacer
2/7/2007 Fenwick Employment Brief - February 7, 2007
A California court of appeal recently clarified which kinds of conduct will support a hostile work environment harassment claim under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). more
spacer
1/2/2007 Fenwick Employment Brief - January 2, 2007
Although employee misuse of the internet is still rife with potential liability for employers, a recent California appellate court decision reduces the risk, at least as to one potential source of liability. more
spacer
12/4/2006 Fenwick Employment Brief - December 4, 2006
The recent settlement of class action overtime lawsuits against IBM and Siebel confirm that the plaintiffs' bar has its sights set on the technology industry, with an aggressive attack on the historical treatment of most engineers and other technology workers as exempt from overtime compensation. more
spacer
11/6/2006 Fenwick Employment Brief - November 6, 2006
On October 10, 2006, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a disabled employee need not prove he was a "qualified" individual to demonstrate disability discrimination. more
spacer
10/17/2006 Fenwick Employment Brief - October 17, 2006
A California appellate court decision, Edwards v. Arthur Andersen, previously reported in the September 1, 2006, Fenwick Employment Alert, has stirred considerable debate within the employment law community about the enforceability of broad general release and covenant-not-to-sue provisions. more
spacer
9/25/2006 Fenwick Employment Brief - September 25, 2006
In Strategix v. Infocrossing West, Inc., the court held that a nonsolicitation covenant prohibiting the seller of a business from soliciting all of the purchaser's employees and customers was overbroad and unenforceable. more
spacer
9/6/2006 Fenwick Employment Brief - September 6, 2006
A recent decision by the Ninth Circuit emphasizes the importance of putting employees on notice that their computer and internet activity may be monitored. more
spacer
9/1/2006 Employment Law Alert: September 1, 2006
A California appellate court expressly rejected a "narrow restraint" exception to California's non-compete statute, an exception relied on by federal courts to enforce non-competes against California employees where the restraint excludes an employee from a narrow portion of his or her profession. more
spacer
8/17/2006 Fenwick Employment Brief - August 17, 2006
The California Supreme Court recently concluded that the "at will" doctrine is alive and well in California. more
spacer
7/26/2006 Fenwick Employment Brief - July 26, 2006
In an unfavorable decision for employers, the U.S. Supreme Court held that adverse actions which do not cause tangible economic harm to employees may nevertheless constitute retaliation in violation of Title VII. more
spacer
6/12/2006 Fenwick Employment Brief - June 12, 2006
In Estee Lauder Co. v. Batra, a federal district court judge in New York granted a preliminary injunction against a former Estee Lauder senior executive who allegedly breached his noncompete agreement by taking a job with a rival cosmetics maker. more
spacer
5/10/2006 Fenwick Employment Brief - May 10, 2006
The California Supreme Court recently issued a unanimous decision holding that three writers for the sitcom "Friends" did not sexually harass their former assistant, even though the assistant was exposed to coarse sexual humor during brainstorming sessions in which potential... more
spacer
3/29/2006 USA PATRIOT Act Impasse: E-mail Interception Rules Need Congressional Attention, Too
When, if ever, can your Internet Service Provider ("ISP") legally intercept and read your e-mail? Nearly anytime, according to almost every federal court that has tackled the issue. more
spacer
3/27/2006 Fenwick Employment Brief - March 27, 2006
In August 2005, we reported on the California Supreme Court's ruling in Reynolds v. Bement, where the court held that corporate officers and directors were not personally liable under state wage/hour laws for overtime obligations. more
spacer
3/9/2006 Fenwick Employment Brief - March 9, 2006
The U.S. Supreme Court recently held that a manager's occasional use of the word "boy" to refer to African-American employees may constitute sufficient evidence of race discrimination. more
spacer
2/23/2006 Fenwick Employment Brief - February 23, 2006
On appeal, a Virginia federal judge recently refused to enforce a Labor Department administrative law judge's order reinstating the first plaintiff to bring a successful claim under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act's whistleblower protections. more
spacer
2/8/2006 Fenwick Employment Brief - February 8, 2006
In recent weeks, three separate California courts of appeal have weighed in on the question of whether the one hour of pay to which an employee is entitled when he or she is denied a meal period constitutes a wage payment or a penalty. more
spacer
11/29/2005 Fenwick Employment Brief - November 29, 2005
The California Court of Appeal recently ruled that, although an employer may ordinarily refuse to communicate through an employee's attorney during the interactive process to reasonably accommodate an employee's disability, in some limited circumstances the employer may need to communicate with an employee's attorney. more
spacer
11/22/2005 Fenwick Employment Brief - November 22, 2005
The U.S. Supreme Court held in IBP v. Alvarez that, under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, an employee’s work time at a meat packing plant included time spent walking to an employee’s workstation after changing into protective gear. more
spacer
10/27/2005 Fenwick Employment Brief - October 27, 2005
The decision by a 3-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals that FMLA releases must be approved by a court or the federal Department of Labor more
spacer
10/1/2005 What Employers Should Know and Do About Blogs
With the proliferation of weblogs or "blogs," companies find themselves faced with a new forum for employee conduct that poses both risks and rewards. more
spacer
9/26/2005 Fenwick Employment Brief - September 26, 2005
The California Supreme Court recently held that an employee’s refusal to follow a supervisor’s order that the employee reasonably believes is discriminatory— even absent a formal complaint—is a protected activity under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) that can serve as the basis for a retaliation claim. more
spacer
9/19/2005 Executive Compensation and Benefits Update - Now We Are Making Sense — Revised Grant Date Rulesfor Options
At a meeting earlier this year, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) announced that, pursuant to FAS Statement 123(R), the grant date of an option would not occur until the employee had been notified of the material terms of the option grant. more
spacer
8/18/2005 Executive Compensation and Benefits Update - New Accounting Valuation Rules for Option Grants—Definition of Grant Date
Under FAS Statement 123(R) options granted to employees are valued based on their fair value as of the "grant date" of the option. more
spacer
8/12/2005 Fenwick Employment Law Alert: California Supreme Court Rules that Officers and Directors are not Personally Liable in Overtime Cases
In an important victory for California officers, directors and managers, on August 11, 2005, the California Supreme Court held such individuals are not personally liable to employees for unpaid overtime. more
spacer
8/8/2005 Fenwick Employment Brief - August 8, 2005
Relations With Subordinates May Create Hostile Environment / Discrimination in Attempting to "Westernize" Employee's Name / Failure to Stop Customer Harassment / $20 Million Verdict in Age Bias Case / 401(k) Documentation / Mandatory Harassment Training more
spacer
7/25/2005 Fenwick Employment Brief - July 25, 2005
California Court Authorizes Partial-day PTO Deductions for Exempt Workers more
spacer
7/20/2005 Fenwick Employment Brief - July 20, 2005
Vertigo Not a Disability under ADA/ Same-actor Inference Defeats National Origin Discrimination Claim/ Lack of Notice Defeats FMLA Claim/ Independent Contractor May State Unruh Act Discrimination Claim/ Meal or Rest Period Violations Penalty Clarified more
spacer
7/12/2005 Fenwick Employment Brief - July 12, 2005
Labor Commissioner Reconsiders Position on Partial Day Vacation Deductions / Criticisms of Employee's Performance do not Support FEHA Claim / NLRB Strikes Down Handbook Provision Limiting Employee Complaints / Employer's Failure to Post Notice May Excuse Late EEOC Filing / Abercrombie & Fitch Agrees to Settle Class Action more
spacer
6/22/2005 Fenwick Employment Brief - June 22, 2005
Employer's Use of "Personality" Test Violated ADA/ Decision Highlights Risk of Using E-Mail to Distribute Important Personnel Policies/ Ninth Circuit Will Reconsider Casino's Requirement that Women Bartenders Wear Makeup/ Hospital Settles Wage/Hour Class Action for $4.75 Million more
spacer
4/26/2005 Fenwick Employment Brief - April 26, 2005
California Issues Newly Revised Meal Break Rules/ No Strict Liability Under FMLA For Employee Engaged In Disruptive Workplace Behavior/ Employer Liable For Discharging Returning Veteran/ San Jose Jury Awards Over $2 Million In Co-worker Sex Harassment Case more
spacer
4/14/2005 Fenwick Employment Brief - April 14, 2005
U.S. Supreme Court Allows Disparate Impact Theory in Age Discrimination Cases/Employers May Not Require Medical Examination Before Making "Real" Job Offer more
spacer
3/2/2005 Fenwick Employment Brief - March 2, 2005
Employer Lawfully Recovered Unearned Commission Advances/Employer's Stray Remarks about Age Enable Older Worker to Proceed to Trial on Discrimination Claim more
spacer
1/10/2005 Fenwick Employment Brief - January 10, 2005
Ninth Circuit Permits Requirement that Women Bartenders Wear Makeup/Indefinite Leave of Absence Not A Reasonable Accommodation When Employee Unlikely to Return Within Reasonable Time more
spacer
12/15/2004 Fenwick Employment Brief - December 15, 2004
Employees Who Resign from At-Will Employment May Recover Damages for Unfulfilled Promise of Future Employment/Employer Not Liable for "Equal Opportunity" Abuser more
spacer
12/6/2004 Fenwick Employment Brief - December 6, 2004
No Personal Liability for Co-Worker Harassment Committed Before 2001 Amendment/Conduct That Ridicules Both Sexes May Still Create a Hostile Work Environment more
spacer
11/16/2004 Fenwick Employment Brief - November 16, 2004
Alert: Voters Curtail Plaintiffs' Lawyers' Ability to Launch Class Actions Against Business/Employers Hit with $650,000 and $1.8 Million Verdicts for Wrongful Termination more
spacer
10/26/2004 Fenwick Employment Brief - October 26, 2004
Disparate Impact Claim Fails Even Though Reorganization Primarily Displaced Workers in Protected Classes/Insubordination Triggered by Employer's Own Unlawful Conduct Cannot Justify Adverse Employment Action more
spacer
10/11/2004 Fenwick Employment Brief - October 11, 2004
Fabrication Plant Workers Entitled to Wages for Donning and Doffing Clean Room Uniforms. more
spacer
9/27/2004 Fenwick Employment Brief - September 27, 2004
Discrimination Claims Not Released by Standard Form Workers' Compensation Release Agreement/Alleged Acts of Harassment Occurring Outside of the Actionable Time Period May Be Knitted Together with More Recent Incidents to Support Hostile Environment Claim more
spacer
9/8/2004 Fenwick Employment Brief - September 8, 2004
California Supreme Court Lowers the Bar for Wage and Hour Class Actions/Interference With At-Will Employment Requires Independently Wrongful Actions more
spacer
8/30/2004 Fenwick Employment Brief - August 30, 2004
California Court Refuses to Dismiss Retaliation Claim, Even Though Decision-Maker Was Unaware of the Terminated Employee's Protected Activity. more
spacer
8/10/2004 Fenwick Employment Brief - August 10, 2004
Gender Bias Lawsuit Settlements Result in Substantial Monetary and Non-Monetary Obligations for Boeing and Morgan Stanley. more
spacer
7/28/2004 Fenwick Employment Brief Special Update - July 28, 2004
Special Update Re: Private Attorney General Act Developments. more
spacer
7/19/2004 Fenwick Employment Brief - July 19, 2004
Private Sector Employee Cannot Sue for Wrongful Discharge Based upon Alleged Violation of "Free Speech" Right/Former Employee Allowed to Pursue Claim for Wrongful Discharge for Complaining About Fraudulent Billing Practices more
spacer
7/12/2004 Fenwick Employment Brief - July 12, 2004
Employer's Notice By Email of Mandatory Arbitration Policy Deemed Inadequate/Court Clarifies Scope of Marital Status Discrimination Claims more
spacer
6/25/2004 Fenwick Employment Brief - June 25, 2004
U.S. Supreme Court Recognizes Concept of Constructive Discharge in Title VII Cases/NLRB Reverse Itself: Non-Union Employees Now Not Entitled to Have Coworker Present at Disciplinary Interview more
spacer
6/16/2004 Weekly Employment Brief - June 16, 2004
A Less Appealing Job Reassignment Does Not Constitute Adverse Action For Title VII Claim/Terminating Employee For Violation Of Harassment Policy Not Pretext For Religious Discrimination more
spacer
6/1/2004 Weekly Employment Brief - June 1, 2004
Court Sends Case To Jury Determine Whether Employee's Refusal To Work With A Specific Supervisor Constituted A "Constructive Resignation". more
spacer
5/20/2004 Weekly Employment Brief - May 20, 2004
U.S. Department of Labor Issues New Rules Regarding White-Collar Overtime Exemptions. more
spacer
4/30/2004 Weekly Employment Brief - April 30, 2004
Corporate Restructuring Not A Reasonable Accommodation Under FEHA/Unequal Pay For Employees With Similar Titles Is Permissible Where Duties And Skill Levels Differ more
spacer
4/23/2004 Weekly Employment Brief - April 23, 2004
Merely Hiring From competitor Not Unlawful Interference with Contract/Employee May Claim Retaliation Even if Underlying Complaint Lacks Merit more
spacer
4/14/2004 Weekly Employment Brief - April 14, 2004
Employee's Contract Claim Withstands Motion to Dismiss Because of Frail "At Will" Provision/Employer Liability for Non-Employee Sexual Harassment May Be Based on Conduct That Occurred to Enactment of FEHA Amendment more
spacer
4/7/2004 Weekly Employment Brief - April 7, 2004
Employer Properly Disciplined "Whistleblower" for Poor Performance/After Eight Years Of Paid Disability Leave, Employee Sues For Disability Discrimination (And Wins, In Part) more
spacer
3/30/2004 Weekly Employment Brief - March 30, 2004
Jury Must Decide Whether Employer Lawfully Refused To Re-Hire Recovering Addict/Saleswoman Facing "Glass Ceiling" Allowed To Pursue Constructive Discharge Claim more
spacer
3/23/2004 Weekly Employment Brief - March 23, 2004
Plaintiff's Post-Termination Misconduct May Bar Reinstatement And Front Pay Award/Court Articulates Limits On Customer Non-Solicitation Clauses more
spacer
3/18/2004 Weekly Employment Brief - March 18, 2004
Laid Off Employees Need Not Show Replacement By Younger Worker To Show Age Discrimination/Bad-Faith Harassment Complaints Cannot Support Title VII Retaliation Claims more
spacer
3/10/2004 Weekly Employment Brief - March 10, 2004
Supervisor's Remarks Support Actionable Age and National Origin Discrimination Claims/When is an Alcoholic Employee "Disabled" Under the ADA? A Federal Court Provides Guidance more
spacer
3/3/2004 Weekly Employment Brief - March 3, 2004
Favoring The Old Over The Young Not Prohibited By ADEA/New York Court Opens Door For Investor Liability Under WARN Act/Employer's Failure To Document Alleged Performance Problems Results In Section 132a Award For Terminated Employee more
spacer
2/23/2004 Weekly Employment Brief - February 23, 2004
Employee Who Exposed Himself To Co-Worker And Engaged In Inappropriate Sexual Banter Did Not Engage In Unlawful Sexual Harassment/Court Holds That Wage/Hour Allegations Cannot Support RICO Cause Of Action more
spacer
2/11/2004 Weekly Employment Brief - February 11, 2004
Subjective Hiring Criteria, Without More, Do Not Prove Age Discrimination/Framework For Determining Joint Employment Status Further Complicated By Federal Court's Recent Ruling more
spacer
2/5/2004 Weekly Employment Brief - February 5, 2004
Telecommuting Not A Reasonable Accommodation Under ADA Where An Employee's Attendance At Work Is An Essential Job Function/Court Expands Permissible Damages for FLSA Retaliation/Affectionate Behavior From "Effusive" Boss Is Not Sexual Harassment more
spacer
1/27/2004 Weekly Employment Brief - January 27, 2004
Denial of Lateral Transfer May Be Adverse Action/Federal Court Holds That Learning Disabilities and ADD Do Not Constitute Serious Health Conditions Under FMLA/Employee's Admitted Use of Marijuana Does Not Bar Her Harassment Claim more
spacer
1/15/2004 Weekly Employment Brief - January 15, 2004
Employee's Termination for Posting Scriptures Condemning Gays did not Constitute Religious Discrimination/OK to Search Employee's E-Mail on Company Server/Newly Enacted Fair And Accurate Credit Transaction Act Simplifies Harassment Investigation Process more
spacer
12/16/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - December 16, 2003
California Court Permits Company to Fire Supervisor for Dating Subordinate/Policy Against Rehiring Violators of Workplace Rules Can Be Legitimate Reason to Refuse to Rehire Former Employee Who Resigned After Positive Drug Test more
spacer
12/5/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - December 5, 2003
Strict Liability Not As Strict: California Supreme Court Acknowledges Affirmative Defense To Damages For Employers In Sexual Harassment Cases/The Sky Is No Longer The Limit: California Appellate Court Applies Federal Due Process Limits To Slice California Punitive Damages Verdict more
spacer
11/19/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - November 19, 2003
Employee May Not Be Terminated For Protected Political Speech Outside Workplace/"Isolated" Slurs About Latinos Did Not Amount To Hostile Environment/News Alert: Job Growth Sign Of Growing Economy more
spacer
11/10/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - November 10, 2003
New California Statute Makes Employers Liable for Non-Employee Sexual Harassment of Workers/Compliments About Jewelry, Clothing and Hairstyle Do Not Amount to Sexual Harassment/Court Enforces Last-Chance Agreement with Employee Terminated for Substance Abuse more
spacer
10/27/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - October 27, 2003
Governor Davis Signs Requiring Employers to Purchase Health Insurance for Employees/Court Rules That FMLA Rule Requires Three Consecutive Days of Incapacity/Sixth Circuit Holds Internal Leave Policies May Not Inhibit Requests For Unforeseen FMLA Leave more
spacer
10/17/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - October 17, 2003
Worker Terminated for Shopping During Sick Day May Take FMLA Interference Claim to Trial/Employer's Threats Support Finding of Willfulness and Additional Year of Overtime Damages/Governor Davis Helps Businesses With Veto of Ban on Employment Arbitration more
spacer
10/8/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - October 8, 2003
Terminated Employee Fails to Establish Employer Regarded Him as Disabled/Employer's Interference with Employee's FMLA Leave Likely Doubles Employee's Damages/Court Clarifies when Employer May Conduct Medical Examination to Assess Disabilities more
spacer
9/30/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - September 30, 2003
FMLA Claim Stands, Despite Employee's Stated Intention Not to Return to Work/Court Ruling Emphasizes Importance of Good Evidence of "Essential Job Functions"/Air France Defeats FMLA Claim; Held Not To Be "Joint Employer" Over Contracted Services Workers more
spacer
9/23/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - September 23, 2003
Employee overcomes dismissal of disability-based claims when court holds that eating constitutes major life activity/Sleep disorder sufferer who requires flexible schedule able to overcome summary judgment on retaliation and disability discrimination more
spacer
9/17/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - September 17, 2003
Ninth Circuit Scrutinizes Facts to Revive Poorly Drafted Sexual Harassment Suit/Reorganization After Acquisition May Legitimate, Nondiscriminatory Reason for Termination/Punitive Damages, But Not Attorneys' Fees, Must be Included in Successful Plaintiff's Taxable Income more
spacer
9/9/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - September 9, 2003
Submitting to Sexual Acts Under Explicit or Reasonably-Perceived Implicit Threat or Discharge in a "Tangible Employment Action" That Makes a Company Strictly Liable for Sexual Harassment Under title VII. more
spacer
8/28/2003 Special W.E.B. Alert: August 28, 2003
Alert: Department of Labor Proposes New COBRA Notice Requirements/New Model Initial COBRA Notice more
spacer
8/21/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - August 21, 2003
Individual Assessment Critical to Success of "Direct Threat" Defense/Second Circuit Allows Exonerated Harasser's Retaliation and Race Claims to Proceed/Court Finds Miscommunication, not Discrimination, in Pregnancy Lawsuit more
spacer
8/12/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - August 12, 2003
Sales Manager Fails to Establish "Disability" Due to Workplace Stress/Labor Department Seeks Back Pay for Undocumented Workers/FMLA Claim Fails Because Company Decided to Replace Employee Before He Requested Leave more
spacer
8/4/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - August 4, 2003
Ninth Circuit Strikes Another Blow to Employment Arbitration Agreements/UPS Settles Disabilities Class Action Brought by Deaf Employees more
spacer
7/25/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - July 25, 2003
California Supreme Court rejects employer trespass claim against former employee for repeatedly sending e-mails to other employees/U.S. Supreme Court allows affirmative action to continue more
spacer
6/27/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - June 27, 2003
Employer Not Liable for Harassment by Customer Sexual Harassment Within a Week of Notice of Harassment/Gay Plaintiffs One Step Closer to Successfully Suing under a "Stereotype" Theory under Title VII more
spacer
6/18/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - June 18, 2003
Self-Defense To Workplace Brawl Not A Basis for Public Policy Claim/Employer Not Liable for Harassment by Customer/ more
spacer
6/3/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - June 3, 2003
Company's Decision to Eliminate "Deadwood" Insufficient to Prove 60-Year Old Executive's Age Discrimination Case/Blondes May Have More Fun, But They Are Not A Protected Group Under Title VII more
spacer
5/15/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - May 15, 2003
Pregnancy Discrimination Claim Can Go Forward Because Of Dispute Over Validity Of Employer's Termination Rationale/Comments About Employee's Body Odor Do Not Establish Race or National Origin Discrimination more
spacer
5/6/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - May 6, 2003
Supreme Court Provides Input As to the Meaning of "Employee" Under the ADA/Constructive Discharge Bars Employer's Affirmative Defense to Harassment Claim more
spacer
4/28/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - April 28, 2003
United States Supreme Court Places Significant Due Process Limitations on Large Punitive Damage Awards/Employee May Not Pursue Claim For Wrongful Discharge In Violation Of Public Policy Without Exhausting Employer's Internal Administrative Remedies more
spacer
4/16/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - April 16, 2003
California Appeals Court Holds Officers and Directors Are Not Personally Liable for Overtime Claims/No Duty To Accommodate A Non-Disabled Employee Regarded As Disabled more
spacer
3/31/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - March 31, 2003
Request For Vacation To Visit Ailing Parents Not CFRA Leave Request/Arbitration Agreement Defeated By Employer Reserving Right To Equitable Relief In Court more
spacer
3/19/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - March 19, 2003
California Appellate Court Upholds Injunction Prohibiting Former Employees From Destroying Stolen Electronic Information/Nine-Month Delay In Reporting Sexual Harassment No Bar To Title VII Suit more
spacer
3/4/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - March 4, 2003
California Supreme Court: Arbitration Protections Apply to Non-Statutory Claims/Employer Liable for Conduct Reasonably Likely To Deter Protected Speech more
spacer
2/27/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - February 27, 2003
Employer Liable For Retaliation Based On Employee's Protected Activity Prior To Employment/Employee May Sue For Retaliation Under The ADA Even If She Is Not Disabled/ more
spacer
2/24/2003 Independent Contractors/Temporary Workers
Workers may be classified in one of two basic legal categories: employees or independent contractors. more
spacer
2/17/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - February 17, 2003
Supervisor's Single Racial Slur Sufficient To Require Jury Trial of Race Harassment Case/Employee Terminated For Slapping A Groping Client Wins Retaliation Suit more
spacer
2/12/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - February 12, 2003
Supreme Court to Review Whether Policy Against Rehiring Recovered Addicts Violates ADA/Second Circuit Revives Wrongful Termination Claim of Blind Employee Not Recalled After Reduction-in-Force more
spacer
2/10/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - February 10, 2003
Court Says "Promoting Your Paramours" Not Gender Discrimination/Age Based Comments Provide Grounds For Discrimination Claim Even When Made By Another In The Same Age Group more
spacer
2/3/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - February 3, 2003
Influential Subordinate Can Be "Decisionmaker" in Discrimination Case/Plan Exclusion of Surgical Infertility Procedures Held Gender-Neutral more
spacer
1/17/2003 Weekly Employment Brief - January 17, 2003
CFRA "Leave" Does Not Include Exemption From Weekend And Overtime Work/Employee's Late Filings Not Excused Where Employer Provided Notice Of Deadlines more
spacer
12/9/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - December 9, 2002
California Employers No Longer Must Reduce Labor Commissioner Awards to Zero To Avoid Paying Employees' Attorney's Fees On Appeal/Sudden End Of Relationship With Major Client Constitutes Unforeseeable Business Circumstances Under WARN Act more
spacer
12/3/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - December 3, 2002
Employer Held Responsible For Unclear Offer Letter/ Bankruptcy Anti-Discrimination Law Does Not Protect Persons Prior To Filing/University of California Must Pay $2 Million For Retaliation more
spacer
11/25/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - November 25, 2002
Labor Commissioner Allows Salary Deduction For Full-Week Shutdown, but Limits Forced Use of Vacation/FMLA Suit Results in $11.65 Million Verdict, Including $900,000 Against Supervisors more
spacer
11/18/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - November 18, 2002
FAQs Regarding Military Leaves of Absence. more
spacer
11/5/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - November 5, 2002
Employer Not Liable For Client's Sexual Harassment/ Inappropriate Jokes Do Not Constitute Protected Speech/Employees Must Meet Performance Standards to Claim Discrimination more
spacer
10/28/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - October 28, 2002
Florida Court Holds Cyberspace Not Covered By ADA/Third Circuit Upholds Exclusion of EEOC Determination Letter/Waitress' Sexual Harassment Complaint Can Proceed Against Both the Mustard and the Fog more
spacer
10/22/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - October 22, 2002
Ongoing Sexual Banter Not Sexual Harassment Under Title VII/"At-Will" Employment "Sufficiently Contractual" to Support Federal Discrimination Suit/DLSE Warns: Less Work Can't Mean Less Pay For Exempt Employees more
spacer
10/14/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - October 14, 2002
Employer Improperly Reduced "Stay Bonus" Based on FMLA Leave/Extra Work and Heightened Scrutiny for Employee Who Complained of Discrimination May Constitute Retaliation/Jury Awards $8.5 Million Against Employer Who Lied to Other Employees About Reason for Employee's Termination more
spacer
10/7/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - October 7, 2003
New Laws Make Employment Background Checks Easier/Ninth circuit Rules that "Adverse Employment Action" Requires An Objective Showing/Governor Vetoes Retaliation Law and Bill Restricting Use of Mandatory Arbitration more
spacer
9/30/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - September 30, 2002
Title VII Allows Claims of Sexual Harassment Motivated by Sexual Orientation/Court Upholds Jury Verdict that Company Discriminated Against Disabled Employee during a Reorganization/Are Employees "Regarded as Disabled" Entitled to an Accommodation? more
spacer
9/24/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - September 24, 2002
CALIFORNIA EMPLOYERS SOON TO BE SUBJECT TO NEW LAYOFF AND FAMILY LEAVE OBLIGATIONS!/California's New "WARN" Act/New Employer Obligations To Provide Paid Family Leave Time more
spacer
9/16/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - September 16, 2002
URGENT UPDATE: California Court of Appeal Rejects Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine. more
spacer
9/12/2002 Trade Secrets Group Client Alert: Inevitable Disclosure is not the Law in California
Ending years of uncertainty about California trade secrets law, the California Court of Appeal, on September 12, 2002, issued a decision that clearly rejects the doctrine of inevitable disclosure as "contrary to California law and public policy," and strongly suggests that California employers protect their trade secrets with "enforceable" noncompetition agreements. more
spacer
9/9/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - September 9, 2002
EMPLOYEE ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS - Mandatory Arbitration Agreements Held Enforceable/However, Compelled Arbitration Agreements May Soon Be Unlawful In California/Court Upholds Employer's Reduction Of Employee's Stock Options Based On Poor Performance more
spacer
9/3/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - September 3, 2002
Employee's Request for "Family" Leave Insufficient to Trigger FMLA Protections/Inappropriate Sexual Comments and Gestures Are Not Hostile Work Environment/NASA Settles Failure To Promote Discrimination Class Action For $3.7 Million more
spacer
8/26/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - August 26, 2002
Supervisor's Actions "At Best Inappropriate, At Worst Cruel," But Not Sexual Harassment/$21 Million Verdict Upheld in Sexual Harassment Case/Pregnancy Discrimination: Key Factors is When Decision is Made, not When Termination is Carried Out more
spacer
8/19/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - August 19, 2002
Ninth Circuit Reverses Leading California Wage/Hour Case/Court Considers Employees of Foreign Affiliate to Determine if U.S. Company Meets Title VII Size Threshold more
spacer
8/12/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - August 12, 2002
Sales Manager Fails to Establish "Disability" Due to Workplace Stress/Labor Department Seeks Back Pay for Undocumented Workers/FMLA Claim Fails Because Company Decided to Replace Employee Before He Requested Leave more
spacer
8/5/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - August 5, 2002
En Banc Ninth Circuit Expands Availability of "Mixed-Motive" Test/Requiring Employee to Drive 100 Miles to Work Not an Adverse Action/Harasser's Continued Presence in the Workplace Can Be a Continuing Violation more
spacer
7/29/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - July 29, 2002
No Religious Discrimination Unless Decision-Maker Knows Applicant's Religion/Unlawful to Deny Accommodation Request for Fear of Potential Violation of Seniority System/Arbitration Agreement That Applies to Likely Employee Claims Held Unenforceable more
spacer
7/22/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - July 22, 2002
Theft Of Trade Secrets May Trigger Automatic Jail Time/Employee Terminated For Discussing Bonus With Coworkers States A Claim For Wrongful Termination In Violation of Public Policy more
spacer
7/15/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - July 15, 2002
Individual Supervisor May Be Liable For Retaliation/Former Employee Prohibited From Contacting Coworkers Because Of Threats/Employer May Be Liable For Insurance Company's Failure To Provide COBRA Notice more
spacer
7/8/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - July 8, 2002
This Special Edition of the Fenwick & West LLP W.E.B. Update is designed to help employers comply with both anti-terrorism export control and national-origin discrimination laws. more
spacer
7/1/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - July 1, 2002
U.S. Supreme Court Does Not Disturb Ruling that Gives Nonunion Employees the Right to Have Coworker Present at Investigatory Interviews/ California Supreme Court Holds that FEHA Does Not Prevent Age Bias in Provision of Benefits more
spacer
6/24/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - June 24, 2002
Policy Against Rehiring Employees May Be Unlawful Under ADA When Applied to Recovered Addicts/Failure to Interview Older Employee May Raise Specter of Discrimination more
spacer
6/17/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - June 17, 2002
U.S. Supreme Court Holds That ADA Does Not Entitle Disabled Individuals To Jobs That Endanger Their Own Health/U.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down Continuing Violation Doctrine For Discrimination And Retaliation But Not For Hostile Work Environment Claims more
spacer
6/10/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - June 10, 2002
News Alert: U.S. Supreme Court Allows Employers to Consider Job Danger to Applicant's Health in Refusing to Hire a Disabled Individual/HIV-Infected Dental Hygienist Ruled to be a "Direct Health Threat" to Patients: No ADA Protection more
spacer
6/3/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - June 3, 2002
Supreme Court Lets Stand Rejection of Employer's Defense In Co-Worker Harassment Case/Class Certification Denied, But Individual Plaintiffs May Proceed On Implied Contract Claims/Employer Fails to Establish Administrative Exemption more
spacer
5/29/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - May 29, 2002
Workers' Vacation Time May Count Toward FMLA Eligibility/California Supreme Court Allows Catholic Health Clinic to Prohibit An Employee's Religious Proselytizing/Tyson Indicted For Conspiracy to Hire Illegal Aliens more
spacer
5/20/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - May 20, 2002
California Supreme Court To Decide Whether Protection Against Age Discrimination Includes Worker Benefits/Hearing-Impaired Driver May Pursue ADA Suit for Failure to Accommodate/Federal Court Strictly Enforces FMLA Eligibility Requirements more
spacer
5/13/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - May 13, 2002
Company's Failure to Take Reasonable Steps to Protect Trade Secrets Defeats Claim of Misappropriation by Former Employees/Fifty-Year Old Laid-Off Employee Will Proceed to Jury Trial on Age Discrimination Claim Based on Recruiter's Comments and Replacement by Younger Person more
spacer
5/6/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - May 6, 2002
U.S. Supreme Court Holds that Established Seniority Rules Ordinarily Trump the ADA/Federal Court Narrows Privilege Exception to Freedom of Information Act more
spacer
4/29/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - April 29, 2002
Court Rejects Class Action by Store Assistant Managers Bringing Overtime Claim/Layoff of Employee on Family Leave Allowed/No Public Policy Violation where Hospital Fired Nurse for Refusal to Drop Lawsuit Against Patient more
spacer
4/22/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - April 22, 2002
Release Of WARN Claims Must Allow A Reasonable Time to Consider Whether to Sign — Or It May Be Involuntary/California Jury Awards $30 Million in Sexual Harassment Suit Against Grocery Chain for Failure to Investigate more
spacer
4/15/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - April 15, 2002
Injured Employee May Sue Employer for Failure to Accommodate/Third Circuit Expands ADA to Cover Retaliation Claims by Third Parties/Employer's Failure to Object to Employee's Unilateral Modification of Offer Letter May Constitute Acceptance of the Change more
spacer
4/10/2002 Important Information Regarding New Proposed SEC Rules
On Thursday, April 11, the SEC will issue proposed rules relating to new disclosure obligations for public companies. more
spacer
3/25/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - March 25, 2002
U.S. Supreme Court Invalidates FMLA Regulation That Penalized Employers For Failing To Give Notice/Employer Cannot Require Doctor's Certification after Every Sick Leave more
spacer
3/15/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - March 15, 2002
U.S. Supreme Court Considers ADA Defense Based On Direct Threat To Self/"Computer Use" Policy Key To Defense Of Wrongful Discharge Lawsuit/Louisiana State Court Awards 18 Years Of Front-Pay for FMLA Violation more
spacer
3/8/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - March 8, 2002
New California Law Restricts Use Of Social Security Numbers/Unanimous Supreme Court Decision Makes It Easier For Plaintiffs To Maintain Complaints Of Discrimination/Employer Not Liable For Death Of Independent Contractor's Employee more
spacer
2/18/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - February 18, 2002
ALERT: New California Law Adds More Disclosure Requirements to Background Checks on Employees and Job Applicants. more
spacer
2/11/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - February 11, 2002
Alert: New California Law Affects In-House Investigative Consumer Reports/Court Finds Circuit City's Arbitration Agreement Too Lopsided To Enforce/Federal Court Raises The Bar For Pregnancy Discrimination Claims more
spacer
2/4/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - February 4, 2002
Be Express About At-Will Employment - Otherwise You Might Get Stuck With More Than You Can Handle/Watch What You Listen To - Court Limits Recording Of Business And Personal Calls/Employer Must Pay Employees For Time Spent Getting Dressed more
spacer
1/29/2002 U.S. Supreme Court Rulings Limit ADA's Scope
After losing a string of disability rights cases in the U.S. Supreme Court in the past three years, disability activists are wondering whether it's time to turn to Congress for help. more
spacer
1/28/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - January 28, 2002
Unnecessary Military Joy Ride Still Protected Activity Under Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act/Employer Saved By Workers' Compensation: California Court Holds Workers' Compensation To Off-Duty Employee/Watch Your Minor Employees Or The State Will more
spacer
1/21/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - January 21, 2002
Arbitration Agreements Can't Stop The EEOC/Get Out Your Wallets to Pay Increased Minimum Wage/Long Workweeks Can Be An Essential Function Of An Engineer's Job So As Not to Require Reduced Hours As An Accommodation more
spacer
1/14/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - January 14, 2002
Most Carpal Tunnel Syndrome May Get Crossed Off the List of ADA Disabilities/Nobody Has to Die First/Punishing Employers for Failing to Give FMLA Notice Comes Under U.S. Supreme Court Review more
spacer
1/7/2002 Weekly Employment Brief - January 7, 2002
I'd Like A New Boss, Please: Employees Not Entitled To New Supervisor as Reasonable Accommodation/Back On The Hook: Court Overturns Summary Judgment Against Time Warner For African American Employees Fired During Workplace Reduction more
spacer
12/17/2001 Weekly Employment Brief - December 17, 2001
Backlash Discrimination After September 11 - World War II Revisited?/Hiring Illegal Alien Janitors - Behavior Worthy of John Gotti more
spacer
12/10/2001 Weekly Employment Brief - December 10, 2001
Cat Got Your . . . Dog?!?/"Walking Timebomb:" A Rare Direct Threat Disability Case more
spacer
12/3/2001 Weekly Employment Brief - December 3, 2001
Anthrax: OSHA's Risk Reduction Matrix/Non-Compete Agreements: Another One Bites the Dust more
spacer
11/19/2001 Weekly Employment Brief - November 19, 2001
Paying for Chat Room Volunteers/Taxes, Speak Now or Forever Hold Your Peace more
spacer
11/12/2001 Weekly Employment Brief - November 12, 2001
Reversal of Fortune/Employer Allowed to Search Computer Without Employee's Knowledge more
spacer
11/5/2001 Weekly Employment Brief - November 5, 2001
Employers Need To Update "Old" Arbitration Agreements/Californians Challenge AOL's Use Unpaid Volunteers And Claim Employee Status more
spacer
10/29/2001 Weekly Employment Brief - October 29, 2001
U.S. Supreme Court to Review The Scope of the ADA's "Direct Threat" Defense. more
spacer
10/22/2001 Weekly Employment Brief - October 22, 2001
New California Law Requires Employers To Reasonably Accommodate Breastfeeding. more
spacer
10/15/2001 Weekly Employment Brief - October 15, 2001
Suspensions without Pay Rendered Employees Non-exempt and Entitled to Overtime Pay. more
spacer
10/8/2001 Weekly Employment Brief - October 8, 2001
EEOC Chair Urges Workplace Tolerance In Face Of Terrorist Attacks/Employee Nurse Better Off As A Patient more
spacer
10/1/2001 Weekly Employment Brief - October 1, 2001
Plaintiff's Prior Work As A Call Girl Held Inadmissible Evidence/Journalist's Limitations in Typing and Writing are not Limiting Under ADA, but May Be Under FEHA more
spacer
9/24/2001 Weekly Employment Brief - September 24, 2001
Court Enforces San Francisco Ordinance Requiring Airlines To Provide Equal Benefits To Domestic Partners. more
spacer
9/17/2001 Weekly Employment Brief - September 17, 2001
Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Military Leave Policies for Employees. more
spacer
9/10/2001 Weekly Employment Brief - September 10, 2001
Employers Cannot Transfer A Whistleblower To Prevent Conflicts With Other Workers. more
spacer
8/27/2001 Weekly Employment Brief - August 27, 2001
Continuing Violations Extend Limits Of California Discrimination Law/College Athletic Trainer's Lawsuit May be a Slam Dunk more
spacer
8/20/2001 Weekly Employment Brief - August 20, 2001
Court Does Not Find Hostile Work Environment at New York Metropolitan Opera. more
spacer
8/13/2001 Weekly Employment Brief - August 13, 2001
An Employer Must Specify The Manner In Which It Calculates Family Leave/Employers Can Limit Time Employees Have To Bring Suits After Leaving Company more
spacer
8/6/2001 Weekly Employment Brief - August 6, 2001